May 17, 2012
By Cameron Cowan
According to the Tampa Police Department (Reported by the Tampa Tribune), a police detective of the Tampa Police Department was fired and three other detectives retired over corruption and dishonesty discovered through GPS Tracking.
“GPS tracking results in 4 officers’ departure:
A 22-month internal affairs investigation using GPS technology has resulted in the departure of four Tampa police officers accused of billing the department for hours they did not work. Three veteran officers retired; the fourth has been fired. In addition to GPS devices, Assistant Chief Bob Guidara said, investigators reviewed detectives’ time cards, gas mileage receipts and surveillance records from the Criminal Intelligence Bureau”
Three of the detectives had been with the department for 22 to 29 years, and the fourth detective had been with the department for 9 years. A spokesperson for the department said, of the 40 detectives investigated, only four were found to be “consistently” not working proper hours.
Regardless of rank, every public official has an obligation to uphold integrity within a department. There’s no doubt that GPS will save time, money, keep track of valuable assets, find corruption, and take control of your organization.
Brad Borst, a former police officer and President of Rocky Mountain Tracking said, “it’s a difficult decision to let an officer go after he or she has dedicated their whole life to law enforcement. Many times an officer makes heroic efforts throughout their career, but one bad choice can end it all. This is just another example that we are all human and make mistakes, but if implemented soon enough, GPS tracking can provides the necessary checks and balances to prevent this from happening,” he said.
Research shows the more trusted employee who has been with a company longer is usually the one to bend the rules. This is because they feel comfortable in their position, and they don’t feel the pressure of proving their self worth to an organization.
Yes, all of our police cars are equipped with hard-wire devices. You can use portable ones too, but I think you will find the battery life is not always sufficient for the job. I personally believe that hard-wire gps devices work the best. You can get a good one for about $395.
Do you guys use a hard-wire unit or a portable one?
No, the packsets won’t do the job. We use real separate tracking devices that are installed in the vehicles. We use them mostly for verification. It seems to keep the citizen complaints down too.
Our department has gps in the 1600 mhz packsets, but it’s worthless. We can’t get the tracking information we need from them.
No, I disagree. That may have been the case years ago, but I think police departments are now seeing the benefit of technology like this and more will start using it.
The only time a department will usually agree to track police vehicles is when something is brought to light.
Generally, police departments will not enforce all police vehicles being tracking. I worked for a PD that had a “look the other way” policy when someone was doing something wrong. The only exception to that unofficial policy was if the officer was doing something that could be a liability to the department. It can be tough to get a job with a good PD, but once you’re in you’re in and everyone sticks together for the most part. You watch my back and I will watch yours philosophy.
I think retiring was the best decision they could have made. It sounds like there was enough evidence against the detectives for the department to have strong case. GPS is accurate. It’s about as good of evidence as having tape or video. I am in favor of what this department did. Using this technology can be a proactive approach to reducing department liabilities.
Three retired? Sure! It was more like retire or get fired. They should have stood up to the department and forced them to fire them. Then, the officers may have had a case.
I wish more police departments would deploy gps tracking on police vehicles. I doubt it will happen though. From what I have seen, the upper ranks in PD’s are reluctant to be tracked. In a sense I do understand how they feel because they always have the public eye on them. But, this kind of stuff shouldn’t happen. It really hurts the trust factor with public officials.
You can’t just fire them on the spot. Police supervisors have to follow a standard protocol through internal affairs. This is a standard procedure.
What a waste of tax-payer dollars. All 4 detectives should have been fired on the spot.
This is usually more common in the larger cities where there is less supervision and more freedom. However, I would say it happens less in law enforcement that it does in any other career.
Yes, that’s a very good question raised by Mr. Foster. It would seem that the officers did not know they were being tracked. I have a great deal of respect for police, but I bet this happens more often than we realize.
It would be interesting to know how they employed the technology. Was the GPS device regularly installed on the a police vehicle, or was some portable device attached to the cars? Besides the interesting technology issues, one can help wonder about the underlying management and leadership issues – people feel so comfortable they can do whatever they want?