<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Legality of Vehicle Tracking Systems</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rmtracking.com/blog/2009/06/07/the-legality-of-vehicle-tracking-systems/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rmtracking.com/blog/2009/06/07/the-legality-of-vehicle-tracking-systems/</link>
	<description>Daily GPS News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 00:10:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.rmtracking.com/blog/2009/06/07/the-legality-of-vehicle-tracking-systems/comment-page-1/#comment-1536</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 22:57:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rmtracking.com/blog/?p=1715#comment-1536</guid>
		<description>Druk,

It&#039;s apparent by your comment that you don&#039;t know much about law.  Let me help you.  

Currently, New York is the ONLY state where the courts have ruled that police must have a warrant.  The courts in Wisconsin have ruled that police are allowed to track a vehicle without a warrant.  

To date, no other court has ruled; therefore, in other jurisdictions where there is no stipulation there is also NO legal requirement for police to obtain a warrant.

You can interpret the Fourth Amendment any way you want if that makes you feel better, but until the courts have ruled, your interpretation means absolutely nothing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Druk,</p>
<p>It&#8217;s apparent by your comment that you don&#8217;t know much about law.  Let me help you.  </p>
<p>Currently, New York is the ONLY state where the courts have ruled that police must have a warrant.  The courts in Wisconsin have ruled that police are allowed to track a vehicle without a warrant.  </p>
<p>To date, no other court has ruled; therefore, in other jurisdictions where there is no stipulation there is also NO legal requirement for police to obtain a warrant.</p>
<p>You can interpret the Fourth Amendment any way you want if that makes you feel better, but until the courts have ruled, your interpretation means absolutely nothing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Druk</title>
		<link>http://www.rmtracking.com/blog/2009/06/07/the-legality-of-vehicle-tracking-systems/comment-page-1/#comment-1535</link>
		<dc:creator>Druk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 21:24:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rmtracking.com/blog/?p=1715#comment-1535</guid>
		<description>&quot;If no warrant is issued, the officers may place a tracking device on the exterior of a suspect’s car that is parked in a public place, such as a parking lot or a street.&quot;

Really?  SCOTUS: &quot;The Fourth Amendment protects people, not places. Therefore, the rights of an individual may not be violated, regardless of whether or not there is physical intrusion into any given area.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;If no warrant is issued, the officers may place a tracking device on the exterior of a suspect’s car that is parked in a public place, such as a parking lot or a street.&#8221;</p>
<p>Really?  SCOTUS: &#8220;The Fourth Amendment protects people, not places. Therefore, the rights of an individual may not be violated, regardless of whether or not there is physical intrusion into any given area.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
