<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who Should Be Tracked?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rmtracking.com/blog/2009/07/02/who-should-be-tracked/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rmtracking.com/blog/2009/07/02/who-should-be-tracked/</link>
	<description>Daily GPS News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 00:10:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: A. Xylander</title>
		<link>http://www.rmtracking.com/blog/2009/07/02/who-should-be-tracked/comment-page-1/#comment-1520</link>
		<dc:creator>A. Xylander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 04:38:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rmtracking.com/blog/?p=2068#comment-1520</guid>
		<description>Again, who&#039;s paying for this and how do we decide who wear&#039;s one and who doesn&#039;t. Consider this, if society started tracking drug criminals to ensure their not selling in prohibited areas, how do we know they aren&#039;t just dealing out the back window? What happens in the home stay&#039;s in the home and GPS units won&#039;t be of value. Your also talking about added expenses, and if you think the criminals will pay, what happens when they can&#039;t get a job? It&#039;s already starting to happen. Who pays then...taxpayers, that&#039;s who. And if we send them all back to prison...again the taxpayers pay for it. Personally, its ludicrous how much propaganda is put out that mongers fear and hysteria to sell a product. Ridiculous. If your bottom lines down, sell a different product, don&#039;t promote something that is ineffective by preying upon people! That makes you all just as bad as the criminals your trying to track!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Again, who&#8217;s paying for this and how do we decide who wear&#8217;s one and who doesn&#8217;t. Consider this, if society started tracking drug criminals to ensure their not selling in prohibited areas, how do we know they aren&#8217;t just dealing out the back window? What happens in the home stay&#8217;s in the home and GPS units won&#8217;t be of value. Your also talking about added expenses, and if you think the criminals will pay, what happens when they can&#8217;t get a job? It&#8217;s already starting to happen. Who pays then&#8230;taxpayers, that&#8217;s who. And if we send them all back to prison&#8230;again the taxpayers pay for it. Personally, its ludicrous how much propaganda is put out that mongers fear and hysteria to sell a product. Ridiculous. If your bottom lines down, sell a different product, don&#8217;t promote something that is ineffective by preying upon people! That makes you all just as bad as the criminals your trying to track!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tiggeronmv</title>
		<link>http://www.rmtracking.com/blog/2009/07/02/who-should-be-tracked/comment-page-1/#comment-1519</link>
		<dc:creator>Tiggeronmv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 21:59:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rmtracking.com/blog/?p=2068#comment-1519</guid>
		<description>The problem with tracking is not only in a question of legality, to impose this additional punishment on someone who has already served their sentence, but on who is most at risk or re-offending.  I have been wearing a GPS system now for two years, yet I am considered someone least likely to reoffend as determined by my tier assessment.   The first system I wore for just over ninee months and had 56 technical violations recorded during that period with every one due to equipment failure.  In MA, this system had a true cost of over $10,000 per person being monitored.  The present system requires a six hour house arrest every evening.  I cannot travel any further in distance in a day than what I can return within eighteen hours.   For sex offenders, why are these not only required of tier three offenders while they are on paper?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem with tracking is not only in a question of legality, to impose this additional punishment on someone who has already served their sentence, but on who is most at risk or re-offending.  I have been wearing a GPS system now for two years, yet I am considered someone least likely to reoffend as determined by my tier assessment.   The first system I wore for just over ninee months and had 56 technical violations recorded during that period with every one due to equipment failure.  In MA, this system had a true cost of over $10,000 per person being monitored.  The present system requires a six hour house arrest every evening.  I cannot travel any further in distance in a day than what I can return within eighteen hours.   For sex offenders, why are these not only required of tier three offenders while they are on paper?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
