<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: When Does GPS Tracking Fail?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rmtracking.com/blog/2009/11/15/when-does-gps-tracking-fail/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rmtracking.com/blog/2009/11/15/when-does-gps-tracking-fail/</link>
	<description>GPS News</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 10:37:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: TimP</title>
		<link>http://www.rmtracking.com/blog/2009/11/15/when-does-gps-tracking-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-1624</link>
		<dc:creator>TimP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 20:15:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rmtracking.com/blog/?p=3705#comment-1624</guid>
		<description>As a retired Police Officer it is my thinking that the reason this sicko was able to pull this kidnapping off for so long had nothing to do with the GPS system.  It was because the Sex Offender Registry (SOR)  is so inclusive, that it has offenders on it that should NOT be listed at all. If the public and the police are to use the SOR it should only list those sex offenders that are high risk to re-offend.  In this case he should have been a high risk, but had the State used empirical based testing they would have had a better idea if he was a high risk. It is time for us to rethink all of these sex offender laws that are not protecting anyone and causing Law Enforcement to run around checking on 1,000's of offenders.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a retired Police Officer it is my thinking that the reason this sicko was able to pull this kidnapping off for so long had nothing to do with the GPS system.  It was because the Sex Offender Registry (SOR)  is so inclusive, that it has offenders on it that should NOT be listed at all. If the public and the police are to use the SOR it should only list those sex offenders that are high risk to re-offend.  In this case he should have been a high risk, but had the State used empirical based testing they would have had a better idea if he was a high risk. It is time for us to rethink all of these sex offender laws that are not protecting anyone and causing Law Enforcement to run around checking on 1,000&#8217;s of offenders.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
