Email

One of the latest and greatest controversies surrounding GPS tracking devices, is the news that the Supreme Court is scheduled to rule on warrantless GPS tracking. The real issue being addressed is where the technology stands in regards to the fourth amendment of the constitution; the right to privacy. Most Americans have their patriot flags flying high, especially around July 4th. As a patriot, it can be confusing where to stand on the issue of warrantless GPS tracking.

As with most issues of privacy, one of the first arguments you’ll hear is, “They’re using GPS tracking technology to protect us from criminals. If you don’t have anything to hide, then what’s the harm?” This is a very sweet, if not naive, perspective. It shows a very trusting attitude towards law enforcement.

Fortunately, most U.S. citizens can afford a trusting relationship with the justice system, but law enforcement officers are just human. They have a job to do, but that doesn’t always mean their intentions are pure. There is enough evidence of police corruption and brutality, to negate the “they’re only using it to protect us” argument.

The United States Justice System was founded on principles of freedom. Essential to those principles, is the system of checks and balances. Court judges are a key component to these checks and balances. They provide a checking system for the evidence gathered by law enforcement. This ensures, or at least contributes to, the most accurate and fair verdict.

GPS tracking devices can, no doubt, help gather evidence to put dangerous people behind bars. Requiring law enforcement to obtain a warrant before tracking suspects does not change this fact. Constitutional laws, such as the fourth amendment, were put in place to protect citizens from the powers of government. Privacy rights do not need to be sacrificed in order for law enforcement to do their jobs.

Article Written by Marisa O’Connor